Fine example of keeping government in check
It’s not often I feel moved to praise our MPs but
good on you, David Davis and Tom Watson.
They have won a High Court battle over a law which
they say allows the police and security services to "spy on citizens"
without proper safeguards.
The government said it "disagreed
absolutely" with the court's ruling and would seek to appeal. No surprise
there, then.
But Davis, a former Conservative minister and Watson,
a civil liberties campaigner who is standing to be Labour's deputy leader, backed
by campaign group Liberty, argued the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers
Act was “incompatible with human rights”.
The Act was fast-tracked through Parliament last
July, allowing security agencies to gather phone and internet data if they ask
for permission…..from themselves.
Bonkers, I know. You really couldn’t make it up.
Two High Court judges today found that the act is
"inconsistent with EU law" and the ruling effectively nullifies
aspects of the legislation, although that order has been suspended until next
March.
Now I have no problem with MFI, or whatever our
security services are now known as, seeking approval to check emails, texts
and phone calls if they have reason (and it must be a very good reason) to
believe our national security is at risk.
But that approval MUST come from an independent
person or body.
Democracy is a great thing but only with checks and
balances.
BT UPDATE NO. 48d
My reader will recall that my letter of complaint
to BT about the shabby way they treated my bereaved mother-in-law was sent by
recorded delivery on June 25.
Having still had no acknowledgement by Tuesday this
week (July 14), I decided to go to the top.
An email to BT’s Chief Executive elicited a
response within hours – and settlement by today (Friday, July 17).
OK, it was disappointing that they asked me to
email my letter (or book as I prefer to call it) again but hey ho, no-one’s
perfect.
The successful conclusion included the utterance of
that seemingly awfully difficult word – sorry – a refund of the installation
cost of moving the line (I won’t bore you with the technical details they tried
to regale me with) and six months free BT phone service.
It was tempting to hold out for a better deal but
at the end of the day it was closure that was really wanted – and someone to acknowledge
their inefficiency and ineptitude.
So thank you, Sam at BT, for having the dangly bits
to do so during our phone calls today.
No comments:
Post a Comment